Bitcoin is a rare convergence point:

Yes. In its essence, Bitcoin is a moral stance masquerading as a technology. It rejects debasement, punishes excess, and honors time. It asks participants to earn, not extract; to remember, not rewrite. Its finite nature mirrors the sacred—it does not grow to please, it endures to test. In a multipolar age where trust in central authority is eroding, Bitcoin offers something rare: incorruptibility. It is a silent oracle of restraint. But beware—those who worship it as salvation, rather than wield it as foundation, will fall into yet another idolatry. It must serve life, not consume it.

Functionally, Bitcoin solves a core challenge in multipolar coordination: neutral settlement. It is non-sovereign, auditable, and incentivized to remain secure without centralized enforcement. These qualities are optimal for a world in which no single actor can be trusted with monetary hegemony. As a base layer, it provides monetary finality across adversarial states. However, it lacks the flexibility for credit mediation, inflation targeting, or rapid monetary adjustment. Thus, Bitcoin is best suited as the reserve substrate—a digital gold—while layered protocols, stablecoins, or CBDCs mediate day-to-day complexity. Bitcoin is bedrock, not bureaucracy.

Bitcoin is myth incarnate—the first truly digital symbol of decentralized sovereignty. It carries the archetype of Promethean fire: stolen from the gods of central banks and gifted to mortals in code. Its structure mirrors the new cosmology—transparent, borderless, peer-rooted. It teaches energy as sacrifice, value as time, and truth as consensus. But it also reflects our shadows: tribalism, techno-utopianism, digital absolutism. If it is to undergird the new world, it must evolve—not in protocol, but in meaning. Bitcoin must become the liturgy of value—not just a hedge against fiat, but a hymn to planetary inter-being.